Dallas-Ft. Worth Metro Golden Retriever Club Lawsuit

 

 

     

        Home

         

On October 1, 2007, the DFWMGRC sent out its Newsletter giving information with regards to the Settlement Agreement for the Dallas Ft.-Worth Metro Golden Retriever Club and Judy Word lawsuit.

 

We’d like to thank them for doing that as by publishing that information for both the Public and the Golden Retriever Community to see on the DFWMGRC website, that action gives further justification for the existence of the Friends Of Goldenwind website. 

 

As a final rebuttal to what Friends Of Goldenwind contend should be the last statement the DFWMGRC should need to make in its Newsletter regarding this lawsuit, please consider the following: 

 

Defendants stated in an earlier Newsletter, November 2006 that their attorneys believed the Plaintiffs' claims were totally without merit.  Defendants also stated in their newsletter:  “Our attorneys will be filing a response on behalf of the DFWMGRC with discovery requests shortly and at that time a copy of the pleadings and an explanatory letter from the Board will be made available to the membership."

 

THAT statement was never fulfilled by the DFWMGRC Board to its members.  The DFWMGRC general membership never received any such letter from the Board as the Board stated in that publication to the membership.  The general membership of the DFWMGRC was not able to participate in any decisions by the Boards with regards to this lawsuit.  Nor was there ever a general membership meeting to discuss the lawsuit.  When a DFWMGRC member would bring up the subject of this lawsuit, they were shot down by the Board.  Plaintiffs did not need Defendants to make any types of concessions with regards to Defendants liability as the documentation contained in this website clearly reflects where any liability/guilt was in this case.  Defendants paid Plaintiffs $7500.  The 2005 Board’s actions should have been declared null and void by the membership for the many reasons that you will see on this website.  The 2006 Board had the chance to settle any disputes outside of litigation and before an attorney was retained by the Plaintiffs and the 2006 Board had more than adequate notice from the Plaintiffs to do so.  Had the membership been advised of Plaintiffs' original offer to the DFWMGRC Board to rectify the situation at hand as opposed to having to go to Legal Litigation, and had the DFWMGRC membership had the opportunity to know all the facts in this case, it is contended that the lawsuit would not have to have been filed.

 

In that DFWMGRC Newsletter, the Defendants state that their motion for summary judgment was compelling and their case strong.  Again, as stated above, Defendants quoted in an earlier Newsletter, November 2006, that their attorneys believed the Plaintiffs' claims were totally without merit.  The 44th District Court in Dallas Texas did not think the Plaintiffs' claims were totally without merit as Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss was denied on April 3, 2007.   The Plaintiffs were totally prepared to go forward and already had the answer to Defendant’s Motion To Compel completed which was originally scheduled for just two days after Mediation.  Plaintiffs also had most of their answer to Defendant’s Summary Judgment prepared before Mediation.  However, Plaintiffs' goal was never to destroy the DFWMGRC as Sherri Farmer misquoted a GRCA Board member as saying at the most recent DFWMGRC membership meeting, stating that a GRCA Board member had said that to her. That GRCA Board member was directly contacted by another DFWMGRC member addressed in that misquote by Sherri Farmer and the GRCA Board member denied ever making that statement.  That GRCA Board member is a well respected member of the Golden Community and in our opinion would not have made such a statement.  The conclusion may be reached after reading this website that there have been quite a few misquotes and untruths stated by certain DFWMGRC members.

 

The DFWMGRC had lost 18 memberships in 2006 (documented in their Newsletter) and had lost another 10 memberships in 2007 (documented elsewhere) that did not pay their dues to renew their memberships.  In addition, in 2007, one Board member and his spouse resigned from the DFWMGRC after just a month or so of his being in office, and now two more memberships have resigned as a part of the settlement agreement of this lawsuit.  The DFWMGRC membership is approximately half of what it was when Plaintiffs first joined in the mid 90’s.  According to documentation, the DFWMGRC has lost over 30 memberships since 2006.  There are currently 54 memberships.  That is a loss of over 1/3 of of the membership during the period under the leadership of the Boards addressed in the lawsuit.  These statistics in and of themselves speak volumes as to what can be perceived as the status of the DFWMGRC in recent years. 

 

Plaintiffs agreed to settle this case out of court as the Defendants  (DFWMGRC/Judy Word) had unlimited resources with a Pro Bono attorney (employer of Sherri Farmer, 2005 Board member) and Plaintiff's contend that the Defendants were going to throw every legal maneuver/roadblock that they could in order to deplete the Plaintiffs' financial resources which were very limited as it would be expected with any family.   At the time of Mediation, the Plaintiffs and their supporters had in their possession enough original evidence and additional evidence through LEGAL DISCOVERY to have the ability to put together this legal website to prove that Plaintiffs did nothing wrong at any time during their membership in the Dallas-Ft. Worth Metro Golden Retriever Club.  Plaintiffs had the support of long time DFWMGRC members and  anyone viewing the lawsuit website can clearly see which party is lacking in ethics and integrity.  The fact that the DFWMGRC paid $7500 to Plaintiffs to settle the case speaks volumes.  It is Plaintiff's contention that IF the DFWMGRC were innocent of any wrong-doing in this case, they would have moved forward as their costs in this case were negligible.

 

It would be interesting to make mention at this time that per the settlement agreement, Judy and Mark Word resigned from the DFWMGRC and those resignations were to have taken effect upon the payment of the settlement check to Plaintiffs.  Plaintiffs received the settlement check on September 10, 2007.  Mark and Judy Word attended the DFWMGRC membership meeting on September 11, 2007, the very next day, and Judy Word actively participated in this meeting by questioning Ann Horton out loud during this meeting that she had no business at being at.  Something to think about. 

 

Most of the Friends Of  Goldenwind are/were long time members of the DFWMGRC.  We saw what happened to the Plaintiffs and some of us were also unjustly targeted and/or sanctioned by the DFWMGRC through the Plaintiff’s Disciplinary hearing and sanctions.  The evidence presented on this website shows that the Plaintiffs were innocent of any wrong doing.  Friends Of Goldenwind contend that the evidence presented on this website clearly shows the Defendants were not. 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

                                         

 

 

Copyright © 2007 Friends of Goldenwind . Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without express written permission of Friends of Goldenwind  is strictly prohibited.